|
Friday, May 20, 2011
SMARTer Tools Pinpoint Exact Customer Disputes and Who Should Fix ItOur new SMART system
at The Credit Department (TCD) launched in December, and we’re getting SMARTer!
In fact, the flexibility of this
receivables workflow system is allowing us to provide sophisticated reporting beyond collections.
One huge benefit
is that TCD clients now know which customers are disputing payments and the dollars involved in the disputes.
Since credit managers don’t generally control these past-due dollars, a new tool exists for them to pinpoint
these disputes and route the files to the internal departments that CAN control them.
While it might seem logical to blame
past due accounts on the efforts (or lack of effort) in the credit department, our SMART reporting results have shown that
you should wait before shooting the messenger.
After working the receivables of one client,
we found that 30 percent of the total uncollected receivables involved some type of customer dispute. In addition, we were
able to pinpoint the dispute to issues such as wrong products shipped and quality problems. Drilling further, we also determined
that the majority of the disputes originated at a specific warehouse. This was a surprise to the leadership
of the company. They now had a way to measure the impact of these warehouse problems so they could correct the issues and
eventually allow the credit department to collect money due.
You can’t force a customer
to pay for the wrong product or a damaged product, yet credit departments don’t have the authority to correct customer
disputes. It’s usually very difficult for credit departments to measure exact dollars and reasons why disputes exist
when they have hundreds or thousands of invoices to work. Disputes need to move to the responsible people
within the company, but that can’t happen until the information is available and clearly and consistently reported.
If you would like
to learn more about SMART reporting options, give The Credit Department a call. We’d like to save a few good credit
managers from an untimely demise.
In our next blog, we’ll provide tips on measuring the performance of your credit department by more
than number of phone calls.
12:15 pm cdt
Thursday, April 7, 2011
Outsourcing Can Enhance Your Internal Credit DepartmentYou may be surprised to learn that many of our clients at The Credit Department
already have internal Credit Departments either managing credit risk or handling collections for key customers. Why would
they need us?
There are actually several reasons that larger companies find value in outsourcing
some of their credit and collections needs. These include handling special projects, in-depth analysis, third-party objectivity
and enhanced shareholder value. Let me explain each of these:
Special Projects Sometimes our clients will delegate a portfolio of customers as an outsource initiative simply because
it’s more cost effective to outsource than to expend time and resources internally. The accounts need to be cleaned
up and managed, but are relegated to low priority due to other more pressing credit or collections responsibilities. Outsourcing
this task provides a tremendous return in terms of cash flow, identifying customer issues that will prevent late payment in
the future and reducing bad debt associated with the portfolio. Our client in this case is the credit manager of the corporation. This person manages
the engagement with our firm while we handle the execution of the resources needed to manage the portfolio. By setting and
overseeing the strategy, the credit manager is still in control of the asset and knowledgeable about process and results.
At the same time, he or she can focus on higher-level strategic work for the organization, such as large account management,
setting risk/term strategies, and reporting results and concerns to senior leaders.
In-Depth Analysis After working with larger corporations over the years, we have found that their receivables software doesn’t
typically provide the ease of analysis or reporting that we as a smaller boutique firm can provide. For example, we can gauge
exactly how many customers were contacted in any one day and how much cash was promised. We can also report from our calls
how many disputes exist, what types of disputes they are, and the dollar impact on the receivables. This level of specific
reporting just isn’t available for an internal credit department without substantial investment in reporting software,
training and access to data.
Third-Party Objectivity One of the results of this level of analysis is that we can make recommendations as an outsourced organization that
might not happen internally due to priorities, lack of data, or politics. Our objective perspective is backed up by statistics
that can be presented by the credit manager and department as convincing evidence to make real, positive process improvements
in the organization. Even if someone in your firm has been saying the same thing for a year, it’s always more convincing
if a third party – backed by statistics — recommends it. For example, the credit manager may say, “Our outsourced
collections group on this portfolio notes that 92 percent of our customers never reach our cap dollar amount for holding orders
before they pay. Therefore, the group recommends that we change the hold policy to 30 days delinquent rather than a capped
dollar amount to reduce bad debt and prompt payment.”
Enhanced Shareholder Value What does clear reporting, analysis and objectivity really deliver to a large internal
credit department? How about more money? As every company is looking to reduce expenses and improve cash flow, ridding your
credit department of collections backlogs and rising bad debt is a huge valuation booster. We’ve helped clients realize
millions saved in write-offs that simultaneously helped them reduce bad debt risk and improve cash flow. When your balance
sheet is stronger, it makes shareholders, investors and lenders much happier. Your credit manager can also focus on more critical
issues than 10,000 delinquent invoices that represent 10 percent of your portfolio by 80 percent of your past dues. From this
perspective, outsourcing is a smart solution even for large companies.
8:53 am cdt
Thursday, March 17, 2011
Every Business Is In the Risk Business It's a sad fact, but you can't trust your
customers to be around tomorrow, even if they've been around for decades. One wrong decision on extending credit could wipe
out your profit for the year. For many mid-sized firms, it's cost-prohibitive to internally evaluate and monitor credit quality
to the degree that an outsourced credit department can. Some reasons for that have to do with the cost and access to
the right information. 1. One-size fits all Many companies will choose one provider to provide credit information. This rarely works well
to evaluate all customers. D&B, for example, is excellent when seeking information on larger companies and in distinguishing
which companies are related. However, small company background and trade information aren't strengths of D&B.
Most creditors have a mix of small and larger customers, so they need a variety of sources to make good credit decisions.
This can get expensive if you contract with numerous (prepaid) sources on your own. 2. Public access limitations
A credit report has
limited public records information. It won't share, for example, that the owner just bankrupted a company last year
and started this one up in the same industry. Access to detailed public records is critical to making accurate credit
decisions. It takes several steps and safeguards for a creditor to be approved to access public records. An outsourced
credit department has this access. 3. Bank information Too many creditors skip the step of obtaining bank information, but it's
one of the most critical components to determining how much credit to grant. Many companies don't bother because it's
very difficult to obtain the information. An outsourced credit department has many relationships and tools at its disposal
to get bank information with extremely high success rates. 4. Personal relationships There is a large network of credit professionals
across many industry lines. If your credit department is less experienced or unknown to the credit industry, they may
lack valuable contacts and information. Experienced credit industry professionals in an outsourced credit department have
deep connections in the credit community and access to information from their colleagues and private financial sources that
might never be shared publicly. These valuable relationships add to the knowledge base that can help you make more accurate
credit decisions. 5. Talking the talk Credit professionals know the lingo of data requests and how credit applications should be worded
to get valuable information. You want a complete file at the beginning of a credit engagement so that it's easier later to
track down any potential problems or collect what you're owed. Forewarned is forearmed. Some of our clients still extend credit to a customer
after we've recommended no credit. A business decision about a client is different than a credit decision. We know that there
are other factors involved in extending credit, but the credit department's job is to point out the risks.
A professional analysis
supports successful risk management so that one bad client doesn't take your profits for the entire year.
If you think that your
business is at a point of requiring a higher level of risk analysis and credit qualification, give us a call.
9:14 am cdt
Monday, February 14, 2011
Easier Collections With No More Compromises “If
they pay within $250 of the total invoice, we’re just writing it off.”
For many consumer products and manufacturing companies,
with sales in the millions, they are willing to make these compromises in order to manage their accounts receivable workflow.
It happens more than you think.
Imagine this scenario: A big box retailer purchases holiday candy (or soap or paper towels) from
a supplier during a discount sales event of six weeks. The supplier is offering a $1 rebate per case. The retailer
is invoiced in full, but takes $1.50 rather than $1 per case as the discount. The supplier doesn’t have the resources
to track these differences and to deal with collecting the differences back, so they write it off and forget about it.
This shortage might only be a few hundred or a few thousand dollars, but these add up over time. However, if this supplier
had automated its AR workflow, the ease of tracking and collecting these differences would potentially bring in additional
thousands and sometimes millions — without adding staff!
Approximately 90% of mid-market and large companies have
not automated their AR workflow. Typically, they purchase software such as SAP or Oracle. These programs simply store information;
they do not allow you to track the status of the open item, attach documents, or send the file somewhere in the organization
to be resolved or collected. There is also no way of tracking historical actions on each item.
Some companies try to solve this
by exporting AR information to spreadsheets or databases to try to create workflow efficiencies. However, a lack of sophistication
and tailoring for specific needs often leads to more bottlenecks than workflow. Staff spends more time organizing their tasks
for the day than handling actual invoices and deductions. The difference between $1 and $1.50 in rebates will not be addressed.
Studies by The Credit Department
show that less than 5 percent of mid-market companies have any type of automation besides data storage for managing trade
receivables. At these companies, revenues range from $50 million to over $1 billion. The more complex the company’s
deduction and collection requirements, the more potential there is to lose millions of dollars from insufficient AR tracking
and collections.
One company we are working with, for example, has about $6 billion in annual revenues and on average is losing about
$5 million in revenues from ineffective and inefficient tracking of customer deductions and invoice collections. By
the same token, a $300 million company with straight commodity sales to a small group of customers would not necessarily need
a sophisticated AR automation solution. Sales volume doesn’t necessarily translate to a sophisticated need for collection
technology.
At the core for most companies is a need for best practices supported by automated solutions that help companies collect
money owed them on thousands of open items. Whether they purchase these systems or outsource the solution to a firm like The
Credit Department, it’s a worthwhile investment that provides a return fairly quickly.
We are prepared to launch our
solution in the first quarter of 2011. To learn more about the proven success of this workflow solution for efficient tracking
and higher collections for companies like yours, give us a call.
6:33 pm cst
Monday, November 29, 2010
Leave the Credit Dark Ages Just in Time The following is a true story of how an automated workflow system in accounts receivable potentially saved a company
millions in bad debt and interest expense — and maybe even saved the company from disaster. The Challenge: In 2008,
a privately held manufacturer selling to small companies, hospitals and universities had 75,000 unpaid invoices totaling around
$13 million. About $2.5 million of this receivable was at least 90 days overdue. When their Finance Department
searched for answers from their local offices as to why customers weren’t paying on time, no one knew the answer. They
didn’t know why customers hadn’t paid. They didn’t know when invoices would be paid. They had no detail
on any disputes. They didn’t know what arrangements had been made to pay down the account and how long the problem had been going
on. The Obstacles: Within each location, people differed on their process of following up
with customers – including how they tracked responses and when or if they decided to turn the invoice over to collections.
Nothing was automated. Even sales people were following up on invoices. Payment terms were often dictated by customers. Simple
notes were kept in the general software, but there was no automated follow-up or reporting on statuses of the files.
Solutions:
The
company realized it needed to centralize its cash application, credit, billing, and collections functions. They studied the options to build
or buy technology and departments, but finally made the decision to outsource all of the functions except for cash application.
They hired The Credit Department to manage the credit and collections process and to implement our custom technology solution
to manage the process. We dug into the records and realized that the company had no internal controls or segregation of
duties, no training on collections and no understanding of why customers weren’t paying on time — which led to
inconsistent reporting to the corporate office. In other words, the company didn’t have an accurate gauge of the true
value of the trade receivables. There was no consistent strategy for responding to customer complaints or bankruptcies or
the volume of 90 days past due invoices. After importing a simple list of all open invoices into our workflow system,
we contacted every past due customer and assigned a status code to every single open item. We set up automated rules that
assigned calls to every invoice that was at least 15 days past due, ordered follow up every 10 days, instituted hold orders
and created collections notifications. As with nearly every other receivables management function we’ve
studied in the past 18 years, we found that collectors were spending nearly one-third of their time organizing the work. The automated task lists instantly
solved the issue of which customers to call on any given day; productivity and results improved immediately. Then we started to get real
answers to the Finance Department’s questions Results: We learned that about $100,000
in past due items were from customer complaints. We learned that some sales people were promising six-month payment terms.
We learned that some items never arrived or that cash had been consistently misapplied. Within six months, we had knocked
$1 million off of past-due balances by establishing payment plans, aggressive collections and new hold order processes. While
it was a culture shock to institute credit holds on customers, the extra $1 million in cash helped support this change.
To
date, about half of the original invoices over 90 days have gone to third party collection agencies. With the implementation
of credit checks and order holds, many fewer accounts with much smaller balances are going into collections. Automated workflow
has been the key to managing the thousands of active accounts – and with just 2.5 people in the collections area. The
company is now much more in tune with key business indicators in a more challenging environment as it reaps the benefits of
an automated collection system. Are You Still in the Dark Ages? Like this company, do you need
to take back control of your AR? You could put a bandage on the problem and hire a larger team to focus on collections without
the automation, but you’ll probably end up in the same mess at a time when few can afford inefficiency.
With
our SMART software, we will soon offer an even more robust reporting environment that allows smaller and midmarket companies
to manage their accounts receivable on the scale of larger companies, but without the high price tag. Our clients will have their
own portal to access the software online, work on files, keep consistent notes and automate follow-up so that they always
know the status of an invoice at any time of day. With a regular Internet browser, businesses can get a real time view of
cash flow while supporting larger issues of quality, customer service, and profitability. An automated workflow system in
accounts receivable would pay for itself within months. If you’re tired of spreadsheets, inconsistent cash flow, and
incomplete receivables information, give us a call.
4:41 pm cst
|